Arguments
Argument questions test your ability to analyze statements logically and decide whether they are strong, weak, or relevant to a given conclusion.
Practice MCQs for Arguments
Fundamental Principles
Argument
An argument is a statement or set of statements intended to support or oppose a conclusion.
Strong Argument
A strong argument is directly relevant, logical, and provides clear support or opposition to the statement.
Weak Argument
A weak argument is irrelevant, emotionally driven, or does not directly address the issue.
Essential Formulation Tips
- Focus on logic, not personal opinion.
- Check whether the argument directly addresses the question statement.
- Avoid emotional or indirect reasoning.
Shortcut Execution Techniques
- Ask: Does this argument change the truth value of the statement?
- Prefer arguments that are practical, measurable, or evidence-based.
Contextual Inquiries (FAQs)
Q: How do I choose between two strong arguments?
A: Select the one that is more direct, relevant, and impactful to the statement.
Example Breakdown: Government Policy
Argument 1: Yes, because plastic causes severe environmental pollution. (Strong)
Argument 2: No, because people like using plastic bags. (Weak)
Example Breakdown: Education System
Argument 1: Yes, exams create unnecessary stress for students. (Strong)
Argument 2: No, exams help students measure their learning progress. (Strong)
Example Breakdown: Traffic Control
Argument 1: Yes, it reduces road accidents and saves lives. (Strong)
Argument 2: No, because some drivers prefer fast driving. (Weak)
Example Breakdown: Internet Usage
Argument 1: Yes, it distracts students from studies. (Strong)
Argument 2: No, because everyone uses social media nowadays. (Weak)
Example Breakdown: Public Health
Argument 1: Yes, it prevents the spread of dangerous diseases. (Strong)
Argument 2: No, people should have freedom to choose. (Weak)
CMAT Arguments Basics Set 1
Foundation-level argument evaluation practice for CMAT, KUUMAT, and aptitude exams in Nepal.
Q1. Statement: School uniforms should be mandatory in all schools. Argument: Uniforms reduce economic differences among students.
Q2. Statement: Mobile phones should be banned in classrooms. Argument: Students get distracted by phones during lectures.
Q3. Statement: The government should increase public transport fares. Argument: Higher fares will reduce traffic congestion.
Q4. Statement: Smoking should be completely banned. Argument: Smoking is harmful to health.
Q5. Statement: Exams should be replaced by continuous assessment. Argument: Exams are stressful for students.
Q6. Statement: Plastic bags should be banned. Argument: Plastic bags are cheap and widely available.
Q7. Statement: Internet access should be restricted for children. Argument: Internet contains both educational and harmful content.
Q8. Statement: Voting age should be reduced to 16. Argument: Young people are mature enough to make decisions.
Q9. Statement: Homework should be reduced in schools. Argument: Homework helps students revise lessons at home.
Q10. Statement: Tourism should be promoted in Nepal. Argument: Tourism increases national income and employment.